A brief abstract of the case concerning the letters patents for reprizals (hereunto annexed) against the States-General and their subjects
Read Online
Share

A brief abstract of the case concerning the letters patents for reprizals (hereunto annexed) against the States-General and their subjects whereupon Capt. Compton Gwyther, William Coates, Joseph Bullivant, John Baxter, Francis Wansell, Francis Martin, John Gibson, and William Jones, prisoners in the Marshalsea, are to be tryed for their lives, according to the common law of England, on the 18th of February instant, upon the Statute of 28 Henry 8. cap. 15 under the pretence of piracy, for taking a Galliot-Hoy (called the Love of Rotterdam) laden with 160 tun of wine, and prunes, on the 3d of December last, bound from Bourdeaux to Dort

  • 274 Want to read
  • ·
  • 81 Currently reading

Published by s.n. in [London .
Written in English

Subjects:

  • United Provinces of the Netherlands. -- Staten Generaal,
  • East India Company,
  • Great Britain -- Foreign relations -- Netherlands -- 17th century,
  • Netherlands -- Foreign relations -- Great Britain -- 17th century

Book details:

Edition Notes

Statementfaithfully recollected out of all the originals / by Thomas Smith Gent. ; with some remarkable observations both upon the matters of fact, and the law in the whole case
SeriesEarly English books, 1641-1700 -- 513:19
The Physical Object
FormatMicroform
Pagination8 p
ID Numbers
Open LibraryOL15038194M

Download A brief abstract of the case concerning the letters patents for reprizals (hereunto annexed) against the States-General and their subjects

PDF EPUB FB2 MOBI RTF

Full text of "Abstract of Reported Cases Relating to Letters Patent for Inventions (between the Years to. Abstract The case against patents can be summarized briefly: there is no empirical evidence that they serve to increase innovation and productivity, unless productivity is identified with the number of patents awarded—which, as evidence shows, has no correlation with measured productivity.   Abstract The case against patents can be summarized briefly: there is no empirical evidence that they serve to increase innovation and productivity. There is strong evidence, instead, that patents have many negative by: IIt is also the case that the extent of practical “disclosure” in modern patents t is also the case that the extent of practical “disclosure” in modern patents iis as negligible as the skills of patent attorneys can make it. It is usually impossible s as negligible as the skills of patent attorneys can make Size: 1MB.

IIt is also the case that the extent of practical “disclosure” in modern patents t is also the case that the extent of practical “disclosure” in modern patents. iis as negligible as the skills of patent attorneys can make it. It is usually impossible s as negligible as the skills of patent attorneys can make it.   Recites Letters Patent of 11 May WHEREAS by certain Letters Patent under the Great Seal of the United Kingdom bearing date at Westminster the 11th day of May , His late Majesty King George the Fifth constituted, ordered, and declared that there should be a Governor-General and Commander-in-Chief in and over the Dominion of New Zealand.   The case against patents. By Brad Plumer In the abstract, it should be possible to balance all these competing concerns. —Alex Tabarrok offers his own review of an earlier book by. in a case brief the court's answer to the issue presented to it; the new legal principle established by a court opinion Narrow Holding a statement of the court's decision that contains many of the case's specific facts, thereby limiting its future applicability to a narrow range of cases.

USA1 US13/, USA USA1 US A1 US A1 US A1 US A US A US A US ACited by: Reports and Notes of Cases on Letters Patent for Inventions [] (Volume ) [Thomas Webster] on *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated Excerpt: Author: Thomas Webster.   The following twelve cases are among the most instrumental in developing our modern practice of determining ownership. The US Patent Act of – the first-ever patent statute enacted by the US government. O’Reilly vs. Morse, – finds that an abstract idea cannot be patented beyond a specific use of that idea. About the Journal. Published continuously since , the Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases (RPCs) remain the leading full-text law reports in intellectual are published on behalf of the Intellectual Property Office as required by s(7) of the Patents Act